Open Hardware definition

When the Arduino people decided to make Arduino open (put the plans online for example), there was no specific license which was applicable to hardware. Open licenses started out in the software realm – they have for example been adapted and modified for text (GNU Free Documentation License) and art (the Free Art License). The Arduino makers decided to use a Creative Commons license because there was nothing else, which was broad enough to cover the load.
At this moment there is an Open Hardware summit going on, where anOpen Source Hardware definition is being written (not to be confused with an open hardware license). A first draft is available here. What makes hardware open?
Here are a few criteria:
– the importance of opening up the documentation (from the plans on how to construct an object to instructions on how to make it)
– including the software you need to make this project work
– of course the derivative works, attribution and distribution are an important part as well

The wikipedia entry on open hardware mentions a few open hardware licenses, I wonder wether this definition will influence these open hardware licenses.

Next to that there is this kind of, how should I call it, blunt? very direct? video on how you can make money with Open Source Hardware. Because in essence you decide to share all the info on how you build a specific apparatus (the building plans, the necessary components) and by doing that you obliterate the element of scarcity. Yet even by doing so, it seems to be livable.

This entry was posted in Hardware, Thoughts and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink. Both comments and trackbacks are currently closed.